Assessing the effectiveness of quantitative models in predicting financial distress compared to traditional financial indicators in the pharmaceutical industry
Keywords:
financial failure, financial ratios, Altman, kida, sherrodAbstract
This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Altman, Kida, and Sherrod models in predicting financial failure compared to traditional financial indicators and ratios used in analyzing the financial position of institutions. To achieve this objective, the descriptive-analytical method was adopted, through a theoretical description and analysis of the study variables. In addition, an applied study was conducted on the data of Hydra PHARM for the years 2021, 2022, and 2023, by calculating traditional financial indicators and ratios along with the most well-known quantitative models for predicting financial failure.
The study concluded that quantitative models for predicting financial failure are ineffective in achieving this purpose in light of recent developments and varying economic environments. In contrast, traditional financial indicators and ratios, despite their relative age, provide a more accurate reflection of an institution’s actual financial situation and highlight key aspects overlooked by quantitative models, regardless of changing conditions and environment.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal Of Contemporary Economic Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are granted the following rights:
1. **Sharing** – You may copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
2. **Adapting** – You may remix, transform, and build upon the work.
3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
### Under the following conditions:
1. **Attribution** – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. **NonCommercial** – You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
3. **No Additional Restrictions** – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
### Notes:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the work that are in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not grant all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
JOCES: International peer-reviewed journal by M'Sila University (Algeria) since 2016. Covering Economics & Trade in Arabic/English via Double-Blind Review & Open Access (CC BY-NC 4.0). ISSN: 2543-3644 | 2676-203X. Contact: reveconomsila@gmail.com